LRepacks YouTube Channel Analytics Report - PLAYBOARD

My repacks basically do not contain malicious modules, adware, viruses, etc. In the collection of works, there is almost zero number of pseudo repacks when an installer from the developer is used (usually installing a "garbage bucket") and modified or additional files are then copied to the folder with the program (alas, there are a lot of such "repacks" now) or when instead of installing, in fact, the portable version is unpacked with subsequent conflicts with Windows UAC, etc. I try not to make stampings, the purpose of which is quantity, not quality The life principle "it's better than nothing" makes you carefully test and repeatedly refine EVERY repack, most of my repacks have additional (from the basic) functionality when installing / unpacking. With LRepacks you usually get more optionsLRepacks
Add favorite
  • Subscribers
  • 301,000
  • -
  • Videos
  • 141
  • 0 Per Week

Description

My repacks basically do not contain malicious modules, adware, viruses, etc.
In the collection of works, there is almost zero number of pseudo repacks when an installer from the developer is used (usually installing a "garbage bucket") and modified or additional files are then copied to the folder with the program (alas, there are a lot of such "repacks" now) or when instead of installing, in fact, the portable version is unpacked with subsequent conflicts with Windows UAC, etc.
I try not to make stampings, the purpose of which is quantity, not quality
The life principle "it's better than nothing" makes you carefully test and repeatedly refine EVERY repack, most of my repacks have additional (from the basic) functionality when installing / unpacking. With LRepacks you usually get more options

View on youtube

  • ∙ YouTube channel creation date : 2017.07.13
  • ∙ Date of registration Playboard : 2019.07.28
  • ∙ Last Updated : 2024.03.29